Mental Accounting

The following summarizes Thaler, R. H. (1999), “Mental Accounting Matters,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183–206. It is recommended that you read the original article besides the summary here.

Thaler’s Examples

Insurance Against Small Annoyances

“A former colleague of mine, a professor of finance, prides himself on being a thoroughly rational man. Long ago he adopted a clever strategy to deal with life’s misfortunes. At the beginning of each year he establishes a target donation to the local United Way charity. Then, if anything untoward happens to him during the year, for example an undeserved speeding ticket, he simply deducts this loss from the United Way account. He thinks of it as an insurance policy against small annoyances.”

Thaler (1999), p. 183

Thaler’s Examples

A Vacation in Switzerland

“A few years ago I gave a talk to a group of executives in Switzerland. After the conference my wife and I spent a week visiting the area. At that time the Swiss franc was at an all-time high relative to the US dollar, so the usual high prices in Switzerland were astronomical. My wife and I comforted ourselves that I had received a fee for the talk that would easily cover the outrageous prices for hotels and meals. Had I received the same fee a week earlier for a talk in New York though, the vacation would have been much less enjoyable.”

Thaler (1999), pp. 183–184

Thaler’s Examples

The King-Size Quilt

“A friend of mine was once shopping for a quilted bedspread. She went to a department store and was pleased to find a model she liked on sale. The spreads came in three sizes: double, queen and king. The usual prices for these quilts were $\$200$, $\$250$ and $\$300$ respectively, but during the sale they were all priced at only $\$150$. My friend bought the king-size quilt and was quite pleased with her purchase, though the quilt did hang a bit over the sides of her double bed.”

Thaler (1999), p. 184

The Three Components of Mental Accounting

The Value Function

Thaler assumes the value function (i.e., the utility function $u$) from Prospect Theory:

Ways of Framing Outcomes

Outcomes can be framed in three ways:

Minimal Account
Compare two options by their differences
only, ignoring everything they have in common.
Topical Account
Relate the consequences of a choice to a reference level set by the context in which the decision arises.
Comprehensive Account
Evaluate each option by its effect on total wealth: current wealth, future earnings, the outcomes of other risky holdings, and so on. Economic theory generally assumes this one.

Framing

The Minimal, Topical, Comprehensive Accounts in Action

The Jacket Example
Imagine that you are about to purchase a jacket for $\$450$ and a calculator for $\$55$. The jacket salesman informs you that the jacket you wish to buy is on sale for $\$430$ at the other branch of the store, located 20 minutes drive away. Would you make the trip to the other store?
The Calculator Example
Imagine that you are about to purchase a jacket for $\$450$ and a calculator for $\$55$. The calculator salesman informs you that the calculator you wish to buy is on sale for $\$35$ at the other branch of the store, located 20 minutes drive away. Would you make the trip to the other store?

The respective accounts in action:

Hedonic Editing

Hedonic editing:

$$\nu(x,y)=\max\left(u(x)+u(y),\,u(x+y)\right)$$

Temporal Spacing

As Hedonic Editing

Temporal Separation

On the Making of an Experience: The Effects of Breaking and Combining Experiences on their Overall Evaluation

Ariely & Zauberman (2000)

Mental Accounting

  • Transaction utility
  • Opening and closing accounts
  • Decoupling
  • Budgeting
  • Bracketing
← Tversky & Kahneman (1981) Intertemporal Choice →